Page 125 - 2022(1) International Confusion Studies
P. 125

118      H. He



                However, the study of the humanities with morality at its core was also
             essential for scholar-officials. It was the basis, the threshold, a mandatory
             qualification. For scholar-officials, their most basic and fundamental identity
             came from their intellect. If they were not well versed, they would have no
             position in society. Similarly, Confucianism is a study of morality. During
             the Western Han Dynasty, after having initially been proposed by Dong Zhong-
             shu (董仲舒 179 B.C.E.–104 B.C.E.), the slogan “Respecting Only Confucianism”
             was adopted by the imperial court, and Confucianism became the sole topic of
             imperial examinations for selection and appointment of officials. It became the
             guiding principle of the ruling class and the dominant ideology in society. The
             emphasis on humanities led to the flourishing of art and culture in China, and
             therefore produced a society where learning was respected. The tripartite role
             of Chinese scholar-officials reflected their position in politics, economics and
             culture, manifested China’s key socio-political characteristics, and cultural
             advancement.
                A Confucian scholar had to properly handle his relations with his peers,
             monarchy, and the people in general. In a perspective of past 2000 years, whom
             did they fare best?
                Confucian scholars excelled in “self-cultivation”. First, they regarded
             Confucianism as a study of self-improvement, from which they drew courage and
             learned to be self-restraint. Such study was a process of self-reflection and
             learning, and brought together a group, a system, and an all-encompassing mood.
             In this process, they discussed ethics, their understanding of Confucian teachings,
             and self-cultivation, and, at the same time, being nourished from literature and
             arts.
                Secondly, it is an education of the people. It can be said with certainty that
             the system of assessment and imperial examinations greatly promoted the
             development of social culture and ethics, encouraged people to learn to read and
             write. In some regions, and during prosperous reigns, learning was popular and
             respected by society. Noticeable cultural improvement was made in certain
             far-flung border regions. However, literacy levels and public hygiene in these areas
             were not all enhanced. It was particularly the case during periods of economic
             crises or wars, when survival came first.
                Thirdly, it exerted influence on power. As a doctrine for governance,
             Confucianism served as a restraining force on the ruler. Emperors were brought up
             in an environment where Confucian doctrines dominated the Chinese culture.
             However, the power of officials was, after all, subject to that of the ruler, so there
             was hardly a balance of power. The supremacy of emperors became more apparent
             after the Yuan (1206–1368) and Ming (1368–1644) dynasties.
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130